<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Possibly Deep Thoughts Comments</title>
	<link>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog by Jeff Sparkes</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jsparkes</title>
		<link>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2007/08/30/do-haskell-programmers-hate-variable-name/#comment-307</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:01:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2007/08/30/do-haskell-programmers-hate-variable-name/#comment-307</guid>
					<description>Yes, but it's still a bit tough.  Somewhere it must be explained what &lt;strong&gt;xs&lt;/strong&gt; stands for.   I think it's a plural of x, as in a &quot;a group of x&quot;.  I'm sure I'll stumble over its meaning sometime</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes, but it&#8217;s still a bit tough.  Somewhere it must be explained what <strong>xs</strong> stands for.   I think it&#8217;s a plural of x, as in a &#8220;a group of x&#8221;.  I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll stumble over its meaning sometime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Capablanca</title>
		<link>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2007/08/30/do-haskell-programmers-hate-variable-name/#comment-306</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:04:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2007/08/30/do-haskell-programmers-hate-variable-name/#comment-306</guid>
					<description>But because (x:xs) is always matching head and tail, maybe short names are acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>But because (x:xs) is always matching head and tail, maybe short names are acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Recording Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2005/02/05/handwrite-one-letter-per-phoneme/#comment-45</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 08:42:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2005/02/05/handwrite-one-letter-per-phoneme/#comment-45</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;New Form of Handwriting?&lt;/strong&gt;

One thing I haven't ever posted on here at Recording Thoughts is handwriting. I don't know how I missed it, as it is clearly an aspect of recording thoughts.

I spotted this post on Possibly Deep Thoughts that talks (via another blog, Journalisimo)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>New Form of Handwriting?</strong></p>
	<p>One thing I haven&#8217;t ever posted on here at Recording Thoughts is handwriting. I don&#8217;t know how I missed it, as it is clearly an aspect of recording thoughts.</p>
	<p>I spotted this post on Possibly Deep Thoughts that talks (via another blog, Journalisimo)...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Robertson</title>
		<link>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2005/02/12/tdd-smalltalk-comparsed-with-python/#comment-16</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2005/02/12/tdd-smalltalk-comparsed-with-python/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>We can be fairly flexible on pricing terms - you should try talking to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We can be fairly flexible on pricing terms &#8211; you should try talking to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Rice</title>
		<link>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2005/01/18/infinite-integers/#comment-11</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/2005/01/18/infinite-integers/#comment-11</guid>
					<description>
Actually, CLISP has its own mathematician-custom-coded numerical library, which was largely uncommented when I last looked, although that may have improved. It beats CLN And GMP by quite a bit for reasons which are not immediately obvious. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Actually, <span class="caps">CLISP</span> has its own mathematician-custom-coded numerical library, which was largely uncommented when I last looked, although that may have improved. It beats <span class="caps">CLN </span>And <span class="caps">GMP</span> by quite a bit for reasons which are not immediately obvious. <img src='http://jsparkes.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
